Hearing in Supreme Court on Waqf issue
The petitions filed on the Waqf law were still heard in the Supreme Court. In today’s hearing, Solicitor General Tushar Mehta made arguments in the Supreme Court. Please tell that on Tuesday, Kapil Sibal had made his arguments in this case. In today’s hearing, Tushar Mehta told the court, Waqf is an Islamic concept but it is not an essential part of Islam. Donation is part of every religion and it can also be for Christian. There is a system of charity among Hindus, it is also present in Sikhs. But in any religion it is not said to be necessary.
According to the report of the bar and bench, SG Tushar Mehta said, “I did not know about this part of the religion of Islamic Islamic concept until I did research, but it is not an essential part of Islam.”
Learn what arguments were given?
SG–Waqf Board has nothing to do with the actual functioning of Waqf. The issue is only that the Waqf Board has two non -Muslim members. The board already has a broad Muslim appearance. The board can remove a maximum of any Mutavalli. If he has violated the law.
In front of the bench of Chief Justice Bhushan Ramakrishna Gavai and Justice Augustin George Christ, SG Tushar Mehta responded to the objection of the petitioners, stating that the new Waqf law violates Articles 25 and 26 of the Constitution.
The court asked Tusshar Mehta whether section 3D was placed in front of JPC?
The SG said that yes it should be kept and it was kept, the bill included before Parliament was placed and passed.
Waqf 100 years old then why not show paper
Tushar Mehta said that where will we bring the paper of 100 -year -old property, tell me that the paper was never necessary, this story is being made. If you say that Waqf was made before 100 years, then you should present the documents of only the last 5 years. This was not just a formality, a sanctity was associated with the Act. The 1923 Act says that if you have a document then you present, otherwise you should present whatever you know about the original.
Hindu Entry Commissioner can go inside the temple
The state government decides the priest in the temple. Here the Waqf Board does not touch religious activity at all. SG Tushar Mehta said that false and fictional story is being coined that they have to provide documents or Waqf will be collectively occupied.
Earlier law was three months
Solicitor General said- Registration was from 1923. On this, the Chief Justice said that the earlier laws had 3 months. Now it is 6 months old. So Mehta said- Yes, and if no one has been able to register, then there is still a chance for it. The confusion is being spread that the property will be grabbed. Is being asked for registration. Removing the condition of registration in the case of Waqf by user would mean allowing something that was probably wrong from day one.
Latest india news